4IR Portal

A Web Information Aggregate [J.N. v. C.G., 2022 ONSC 1198 at Paragraph 48]

NBIC Nanotechnology | Biotechnology | Information Technology | Cognitive Science

FOUR Years

of oppression facilitated by state contractors involving neurotech crimes in support of private commercial interests, and a Federally-sponsored litigant implicated in a shareholder scandal.

FOUR Vectors

[1] Relentlessly stalked, harassed, threatened, and surveilled through PsyOps, IO, and apps (here), [2] plundered through a half-million-dollar court scandal (here), [3] consistently denied access to justice and safe avenue (here), and [4] positioned as an offender and/or a nuisance when seeking the latter (here).

THREE Avenues

Relief and safe avenues consistently blocked in [1] courts, [2] police agencies, and [3] regulators, with all three being weaponized against their mandates.

ONE Scandal

leveraging Canadian institutions and authorities to facilitate private commercial interests involving Biodigital Convergence (defined here).

ONE Solution

Whistleblowers, Accountability, and Restitution for Victims.

Neurotech Crime Impacts a Lawsuit

Understanding this Web Page.

Read this Carefully.

Per my Testimony, I submit I was, and am, the victim of a neurotech crime, which was leveraged to support a commercial and government entity ("CAGE") in the lawsuit referenced (here). AI-Assisted cyber torture has accompanied this effort (here). My biometric data is available to specific actors in the dark web, and is used as a harassment tool and a means to surveil. My objective in this page is not to provide a complete evidentiary record. Rather, by way of an exploration of concrete milestones, visual evidence, information from credible sources, and inferences guided by the test criteria in Sherman Estate v. Donovan, 2021 SCC 25, [2021] 2 S.C.R. 75 at paragraphs 97-98, I aim to demonstrate the merit in this disclosure, and that the feasibility of alternative explanations to the scandal detailed on this website is vitiated to the point of inadmissibility.

Concerning the Presentation Format.

Quoting the Federal Court of Canada, the Ontario Supreme Court recognized the admissibility of information obtained through websites in J.N. v. C.G., 2022 ONSC 1198 at Paragraph 48;

“Information obtained from the internet can be admissible if it is accompanied by indicia of reliability, including, but not limited to;

Whether the information comes from an official website from a well-known organization;
Whether the information is capable of being verified;
Whether the source is disclosed so that the objectivity of the person or organization posting the material can be assessed.”

I affirm that the online articles quoted and visually excerpted on this website are sourced unchanged from the originals, and amalgamated in a manner that allows the unbiased reader to glean meaningful relations. The machine-assisted outputs on this page, although reliable, are intended to assist readers in understanding the subject matter. The source case law at ITV Technologies Inc. v. WIC Television Ltd., 2003 FC 1056 at paragraphs 13 & 18 is applicable as follows, as is the remainder of the case law concerning admissibility;

“In my view, when considering the contents of a web site, the original is found on the Internet and provides better evidence than a print copy. The Court was able to see the documents as they existed on the Internet, and could witness such features as hyperlinking and interactive streaming that could not have been realistically reproduced on paper. [...] As for unofficial web sites, I accept Mr. Carroll's opinion that the reliability of the information obtained from an unofficial web site will depend on various factors which include careful assessment of its sources, independent corroboration, consideration as to whether it might have been modified from what was originally available and assessment of the objectivity of the person placing the information on-line.”

The Topic.

Explored in a Non-Technical Manner.

The Effect (Reading).

The Effect (Writing).

The Consequences.

An FYI For Techies (Terahertz Waves).

Working Definitions

What is a Neurotech or "Cognitive Liberty" Crime?

Cognitive Liberty Crime Defined.

Crimes that affect a person’s cognitive liberty are recognized under UN General Assembly Resolutions A/HRC/RES/51/3 (here) and A/HRC/57/61 (here), and are described in greater detail in the Appellant’s website Testimony (here). The issue has recently attracted the interest of Time Magazine and the Harvard Gazette, among the scores of similar publications quoted at the bottom of the page.

Per the UN General Assembly’s definition in A/HRC/57/61 at paragraph (5);

“Neurotechnologies are unique and socially disruptive because they generally: (a) enable the exposition of cognitive processes; (b) enable the direct alteration of a person’s mental processes and thoughts; (c) bypass the individual’s conscious control or awareness; (d) enable non-consensual external access to thoughts, emotions and mental states; (e) are nurtured by “neurodata”, which are needed for their own functioning, calibration and optimization; and (f) collect, analyse and process large personal datasets of a highly sensitive nature.”

UN Special Rapporteur Ana Brian Nougrères outlined neurotech crimes in the adjacent UN article, alongside neuroethicist Dr. Nina Farahany below, and WEF keynote Dr. Yuval Noah Harari below right.

The Government of Canada has Massive Interest in BCI Technologies [Here].

How Would, or Could, the Existence of a Cognitive Liberty Crime be Discerned?

In the Absence of Whistleblower Testimony;

There are three key components that can inform a reasonable inference guided by the test criteria in Sherman Estate v. Donovan, 2021 SCC 25, [2021] 2 S.C.R. 75 at paragraphs 97-98;

“This Court has held that it is possible to identify objectively discernible harm on the basis of logical inferences (Bragg, at paras. 15‑16). But this process of inferential reasoning is not a licence to engage in impermissible speculation. An inference must still be grounded in objective circumstantial facts that reasonably allow the finding to be made inferentially. Where the inference cannot reasonably be drawn from the circumstances, it amounts to speculation (R. v. Chanmany, 2016 ONCA 576, 352 O.A.C. 121, at para. 45) [...] Where the feared harm is particularly serious, the probability that this harm materialize need not be shown to be likely, but must still be more than negligible, fanciful or speculative.”

The first component involves extreme behavioural outliers as measured against my BIO, and a lifetime of consistent baseline behaviours.

The second component involves a sophisticated criminal group that uses biometric data as a vehicle of harassment and a mode of surveillance, such as the examples shown on the Guide page.

The third component involves a four-year event chronology detailed at the Affidavits page, and shown through the blog contents (here). It features the same organized criminal group, a shareholder scandal, a scandal concerning adjudicative agencies and police, and detailed information exhibits concerning the Fourth Industrial Revolution (“4IR”) and associated technologies. Each of these intertwined matters are compelling in their own right, and occasion the existence of a compelling project interest.

I submit my cognitive liberty was initially compromised in February 2021, following what can best be described as an anomalous health incident. A second anomalous health incident occurred in January 2022 while viewing content by the online criminal cohort on my smartphone. Following a countdown (3...2...1...!), I experienced an acute sensation that resembled an “air puff” test that one might experience at an eye doctor (non-contact tonometry). An eye exam on September 25th, 2023 revealed novel anomalies in my retinas which were not present in previous tests.

Alongside a reasonable inference of cognitive tampering that affected my decision-making, it is understood that bad actors have had access to my biometric data in the dark web at least since the same 2021 event, though the Testimony contains relevant insights dating back to 2013.

How Did The Behavioural Outliers Manifest?

In Ways That Preclude Any Other Reasonable Explanation.

Travel Records

In July 2021, I listed my home for sale, packed my bags, and relocated to BC in further support of the 2021 shareholder dispute with the CAGE, regardless of the fact that I had previously retained a BC law firm to remotely manage the matter on my behalf. I am not at all given to disproportionate extremes such as these, which were entirely unnecessary, dangerous, and utterly absurd in view of the circumstances at that juncture. Those familiar with me would suggest I am often loath to drive across town to attend a function I enjoy, let alone drive across the country to pursue a legal matter that is expected to be managed by a law firm in that same area, and list my dream home for sale on MLS. Furthermore, I am not easily shaken by new and upsetting circumstances.

I had worked for years to develop my personal real estate, which was at that time fully paid for and renovated. I had two motorcycles in the garage, a specialty sports car in the driveway, an exotic pet, and a robust bank account by my standards. That required a lot of time and effort to achieve, and I did it through discipline and smart choices over a number of years. The CAGE Director would in fact characterize me in the same fashion, having worked with me for four years, as he had stated in a recommendation letter (an Affidavit sworn January 9th, 2025 at Exhibit F). Because the law firm I retained in BC could have handled the matter while I remained in Nova Scotia, there was no merit nor value in the excursion, or the home sale. On arrival in BC in late July 2021, I remained in a Condo rental from August through October while coordinating with the law firm on the shareholder dispute. My home sold in late September that year. Following the close of the settlement, I drove back to Nova Scotia from British Columbia by car to reside with my Mother.

It gets worse. Two weeks following my return to Nova Scotia, during the first week of November 2021, I found myself once again driving to British Columbia. I had no distinct plan in mind; only that I was under the impression that the shareholder matter remained unresolved, and that I had to return to BC again in person to address it. Having said that, I made no plans nor preparations to visit the court, as I stated in an Affidavit I had sworn on May 20th, 2022. I arrived in Surrey, BC on November 10th, 2021 to a condo I had rented on Craigslist. It was shortly after that that the "diffuse & disrupt" events as described in the Testimony and Q/A pages began in earnest. To reiterate, I signed a one-year lease without a vision, without any income, and drove across Canada again (coast to coast) after emerging from a perilous shareholder dispute. That is about as far removed from my typical baseline behavioural scheme as ice is to fire, and is just as absurd as the adjudicative concurrence detailed in the civil proceedings (here). Bank records detailing these excursions across Canada are shown (here).

I submit that these actions would not have occurred were my cognitive liberty intact. Prior to the onset of these events, I had lived quietly my entire life and had focused on the career I had nurtured through my skill-set in enterprise sales. I have no criminal record, I was never in debt, and I have avoided bad decisions that lead to destructive outcomes. I am careful by nature, and I avoid conflict where possible. Ultimately, if a person has a tendency to make reckless decisions with their life and money, they would have had to have won the lottery to achieve what I did through hard work, patience, and discipline over many years. Investigators will recognize that the behavioral outliers do not add up (Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, [2019] 4 SCR 653 at paragraph 104).

It should likewise be noted that I had maintained amicable relations with the CAGE entity following the end of a four-year business engagement in December 2019 due to the strategic value perceived in doing so, as I had with the numerous other business contacts I had worked with over the course of a fifteen-year career. I had in fact developed a new venture with him following a project that ended in May 2018. Being a practical person, I do not mix business with my personal life, nor do I allow setbacks to change the guiding parameters that govern my decision-making.

Can You Show Examples of Surveillance?

Occurrences Like These Require a Proximate Data Stream.

The Guide page contains further examples beyond these three shown below, with a detailed analysis. I did not create this or any content.

As above per the embellished HRP report that was fed to EHS.
Full details at the HRP Page (Here). Sheridan et al., 2020 (here).

Milestone Events are Always Referenced. Examples: (1) Retainer Fee Scandal, (2) Bank Account Freeze.

The CAGE Panicked When 4IR & Related AI-Assisted Mischief Was Sworn into an Affidavit.

What Law Firm Would Threaten to Strike a Petition Shortly After an Order for Forensic Audit..?

Context: Per the account at the Civil page, I had sworn an account of the events between November 2021 and March 2022 in an Affidavit on May 20th, 2022, and sent it via courier to a BC process-serving agency. These events concerned the related criminal element that compelled the filing of S-220956 (here). A few weeks prior, the BCSC issued an order to seek forensic discovery of the shareholder records (here). While the Affidavit was still enroute (I had not informed anyone), the CAGE threatened to strike S-220956. Such a motion would be doomed to fail following the discovery order. There are many such examples germane to surveillance.

The AI-Assisted Cohort Rejoiced Over the Petition Dismissal. Further Milestones [Here]

Who Might the Perpetrators Be and What Might be Their Motivation?

The Effects are Disproportionate to the Interests & Capabilities of the CAGE Alone.

While a retaliatory hate crime in response to a shareholder dispute with the Director of a federally-sponsored Commercial and Government Entity ("CAGE") is feasible as an initial consideration, and whereas the criminal element in question has made references to the same, the scope of the scandal involved is disproportionate to the commercial interests of a small to mid-sized company. Under normal circumstances, the CEO of a mid-sized company could not emerge from a legal battle involving filed proof of shareholder fraud, perjury, and collusion with a $400,000 paycheque; nor could any litigant without significant third-party assistance. Third party assurances are demonstrated in the scandal involving retainer fees alone, 737.7 hours vs. 9 short-chambers motions, as shown in the CAGE Affidavit and BCSC Clerk's Notes here. A reasonable litigant would not agree to that scope of retainer; a reputable law firm (Canada's 4th largest) would not propose it; nor would an unbiased adjudicator certify and/or enforce it. Yet all of those boxes were ticked. That inexorably requires an assuring stakeholder positioned to influence the conduct of the agencies involved; a project interest to justify the risk and coordinate the effort; and a unifying narrative to sell the value of consistent and continued participation among the same persons and entities. In this context, the CAGE represents a peripheral interest as an accomplice to the sponsoring interest. These are compelling thresholds. It raises serious questions regarding circles of influence in Canada, which are decidedly post-democratic in character as is evidenced by the effects shown. As Dr. Klaus-Gerd Giesen comments below, biodigital convergence projects are driven by robust commercial interests. It would be presumptuous to assume that I am the only victim of such crimes.

It's Driven by Commercial Interests.

Transhumanism as the Dominant Ideology of the Fourth Industrial Revolution
By Klaus-Gerd Giesen, Translated and edited by Cadenza Academic Translations
Translator: Ruth Grant, Editor: Matt Burden, Senior editor: Mark Mellor Pages 189 to 203

“Transhumanist thought can be broken down into three main premises, each with an eminently political intent: Human beings in their ‘natural’ state are obsolete and ought to be enhanced by technology, which then becomes a means of artificially extending the hominization process. Thus, transhumanism sweeps human taxonomy into the political arena. An observation by Michel Foucault, written in 1976, comes to mind: ‘What might be called a society’s threshold of modernity has been reached when the life of the species is wagered on its own political strategies. Modern man is an animal whose politics places his existence as a living being in question.’ In other words, transhumanists believe we have a duty to replace the category of human with a new creature, a post-sapiens sapiens.” [...] “Transhumanist ideology is driven by certain factions within the state and, above all, by mighty multinational corporations that, it is fair to say, have the most to gain from seeing the NBIC revolution unfold without a hitch. In this respect, transhumanism is already a dominant ideology, as it crushes all other ideological positions regarding technological change — particularly those of humanists of all stripes and subscribers to “deep ecology” — under the sheer weight of money. [...] These tech giants have already poured staggering amounts of money into the fourth industrial revolution and are currently spending equally eye-watering amounts on political lobbying and social engineering initiatives. [...] There is every reason to fear that the world will launch into the fourth industrial revolution without too much debate over what is waiting in the wings: the global political project that is transhumanism. Today, it is as if the metamorphosis, via the “NBIC Great Convergence,” to a posthuman being, technologically enhanced and fully integrated with the machine, were already written in stone.”

Link

A Typical Bitcoin Mining Rig Requires 1,000 Watts of Power While Running [link]. The Human Brain Only Requires 12.

Supplemental to the Testimony Page [Here]. Neurotech Crimes are a Reality.

It's Driven by Ideological Interests.

Value(s): Building a Better World for All [Link]
Prime Minister Mark Carney, 2021, ISBN 0008485240, P. 36, 95, 494

“Moral sentiments are not inherent. To use the modern terminology of Richard Dawkins, they are social memes that are learned, imitated and passed on. Like genetic memes, they can mutate, in behavioural cascades and tipping points."

“Magna Carta was a desperate and probably disingenuous attempt at a peace treaty that failed almost immediately. Brokered by the Church, and issued by King John in June 1215, the Charter sought to placate the disgruntled barons. [...] If Magna Carta was such a product of its time, how did it become to be so venerated? And once we cut through the legend, what is its significance for economic governance today?"

"The world is being reset. Now we are on the cusp of what some have called a Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). Applications of artificial intelligence are spreading due to advances in robotics, nanotechnology and quantum computing. Our economies are reorganising into distributed peer-to-peer connections across powerful networks – revolutionizing how we consume, work and communicate. Solidarity will determine the success of the 4IR, where the need for new institutions that live the value of solidarity is the greatest.”

Dr. Colin Crouch, Post Democracy, 2004, ISBN 0-7456-3315-3

Applicable Tests

Sherman Estate v. Donovan, 2021 SCC 25, [2021] 2 S.C.R. 75 at paragraphs 97-98 | Canada (Attorney General) v. Bedford, 2013 SCC 72 (CanLII), [2013] 3 SCR 1101 at paragraph 76 | R. v. Ahmad, 2020 SCC 11, [2020] 1 S.C.R. 577 at paragraph 38 | R. v. Wise, [1992] 1 S.C.R. 527 at paragraphs 534-538 | Nova Scotia Teachers Union v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2023 NSCA 82 at paragraph 7 | Charkaoui v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 SCC 9 (CanLII), [2007] 1 SCR 350 at paragraphs 22, 23, & 27

Geoff Ralston [Y-C Archive]

Patent [Linkedin Archive]

Enabling Beliefs

Among its Lesser Known Modalities, 4IR Concerns Connecting Human Bodies to the Internet.

An Industrial Revolution is a Society-Changing Milestone.

Discussion of 4IR is muted due to it's controversy. This fact must be mated to its prevalence among stakeholder communities. The archived UN Decade of Action publication, posted in 2020 but deleted in April 2025, lists the media as a stakeholder partner as opposed to an independent news source. This is shown below with highlighted text. Given Dr. Giesen's research publication and the data underpinning 4IR, and its controversy, it stands to reason that signal change may be introduced through disruptive events. Pay attention! See further analysis (here).

Download

Link

He's Right; The Canadian Government Would Not Be As Transparent.

Might a Discreet Brain-Computer Interface Used in Neurotech Crime Seem Sensational?

Not in Our Day. Execution is Easy For Sophisticated Actors Who Now Have the Tools.

A capability for remote neurotech crime that can impact a subject’s cognitive liberty is readily available to sophisticated actors. A sophisticated actor could compromise the outcome of a legal proceeding through the manipulation of neurodata and it would be very difficult to prove. Depending on the scenario, the litmus test would reside in the case law. With respect to this scandal, one need only look at the massive disparity between the filed court records and the disposition of the proceedings, the hundreds of legal tests that were violated to facilitate the outcomes that occurred, and the behavioural outliers cited earlier.

With respect to enablement vehicles, Graphene Quantum Dots (“GQD”), crystalline nanoparticles that are often less than two (2) nanometers in diameter (here), can achieve a remote brain-computer-interface (“BCI”). These biocompatible particles, introduced via injection or inhalation, can cross the blood brain barrier. The most capable research MRI scanners can parse nanoscale particles 5.6 nanometers or larger (here), whereas clinical scanners are nowhere near that capability. Remote BCI interfaces have been researched since the 1990s;

“In order to realize the fullest potential of BCI, we need a system that 1) transmits data wirelessly, 2) does not rely on surgical installation, 3) maintains the proximal contact between nerve tissue and material required for efficient transfer of energy and information, and 4) can both stimulate and record neural activity (or bidirectional capabilities). To bridge the gap between invasive and non-invasive technologies, nanoscale materials, such as biocompatible nanoparticles, provide a promising alternative, allowing us to design materials at the scale of cellular systems and structures. [...] Using nanoparticles as antennae in the brain is a concept that has enjoyed extensive study in academic laboratories over the past 15 years. The vast majority of this work has focused on using nanoparticles for neuromodulation.”
https://medcitynews.com/2025/02/biocompatible-nanoparticles-tiny-antennae-with-huge-potential-for-brain-computer-interfaces/

The technology has advanced to the extent that an off-the-shelf Android phone can act as an EEG device (transmission node), and that is just the technology we are aware of;

“Significance: We present a fully smartphone-operated, modular closed-loop BCI system that can be combined with different EEG amplifiers and can easily implement other paradigms.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29349070/

The deleted Linkedin article below, concerning Microsoft patent WO2020060606, enables such connectivity to mine cryptocurrency using biometric (body) data. The utility is obvious, as cryptocurrency mining requires an extremely onerous and costly energy expenditure. While a typical bitcoin mining rig requires over 1,000 watts of power to operate, the human brain can yield the same results using just twelve (12) watts, without incurring a power bill;

“Nanotechnology, the manipulation of matter on an atomic and molecular scale, has made remarkable strides in diverse fields, including healthcare. In recent times, nanotechnology has gained significant attention due to its potential applications in vaccine development and drug delivery. Microsoft's patent alludes to the possibility of coupling nanotechnology with vaccinated individuals, effectively turning them into antennas or transmitters. This intriguing concept raises questions about the extent of integration between technology and the human body, blurring the line between biological and technological systems.”
https://archive.ph/FfOVM

The Graphene Quantum Dot ("GQD") is a Discreet Enablement Vehicle for Neurotech Crime.

"And it hath come to pass, at that time, I search Jerusalem with lights, And I have laid a charge on the men Who are hardened on their preserved things, Who are saying in their heart: Jehovah doth no good, nor doth He evil." - Zephaniah 1:12

As Noted at the Top, a GQD System is Consistent With the Observed Effects.

There are no Foundational Beliefs Held by Stakeholders That Would Preclude Human Experimentation.

Their Words, Not Mine.

Since 2022 when these crimes became apparent, I availed myself to begin researching the musings and publications germane to the subject matter. In doing so, my objective was to determine if a predominant corpus of beliefs and aspirations could be identified, and the results are compelling. A collection of quotes are shown below on this page to that effect, with further visuals below and in the testimony (here). A predominantly postmodern hermeneutic is explored at the Politics page (here), which sets the stage for an ideology that presumes the acceptability of introducing human taxonomy as a talking point in sociopolitical think tanks such as Policy Horizons Canada. A postmodern outlook assumes truth is subject to human consensus, that the physical world can encapsulate the entirety of meaning, and that the onus is solely on humanity to engineer its destiny. An assumption is made that many of the social challenges can be remedied through genetic or biodigital adaptations. Below, former Y-Combinator CEO Geoff Ralston suggests "toxic" persons can be fixed with gene therapy. Dr. Yuval Harari's comments on "digital dictatorships" are noteworthy, as a transition to a biodigital future need not hinge on the ideological preferences of a ruling class, but will invariably emerge as a result of innovations in data-processing systems. You won't hear about that on six o'clock news.

Asking Intelligent Questions

Are Adjudicators, Law Enforcement Officials, and Regulators Exposed to Cognitive Tampering?

Five Years, Five Courts, Three Police Agencies, & Regulators Yield Results That Defy Logic.

The overarching phenomenon in the scandal detailed on this website concerns a concurrence of behaviour among adjudicators and stakeholders in the public service, including law enforcement. Earlier in the page and (here), I highlighted that a half-million-dollar scandal involving retainer fees concerning nine (9) short hearings must require assurances from the state to execute. No less than a dozen judges in five court venues had replicated unconstitutional effects in facilitating this felony, and two law enforcement agencies, including the RCMP, had ignored basic policing standards. The effects are severe, and whereas the effects of unaddressed crime and abuses of public authority are never limited to the immediate victims. What was it that had occasioned an alignment and consistency among stakeholders?

While it is satisfied that post-democratic conditions are required for this outcome, the severity of the scandal introduces consideration of an ethics crisis in the public service. Despite strongly-held beliefs and opinions, and despite postmodern assumptions that suggest morality is a social construct, every person has a moral code, or conscience. It may in fact be more appropriate to infer a case of cognitive tampering than assume every adjudicator involved in the 4-year scandal is corrupt to the point of moral bankruptcy. I fail to see a residual category.

Is there a cognitive liberty component at stake here affecting stakeholders and influencers (and even my 2021 counsel) in the proximate ecosystem? The scope and consistency of the record, coupled with my own experience, underscores the relevance of the question.

Stonewalled Police Support.

HRP / POLCOM

RCMP / CRCC

Federal Court

Extreme Adjudicative, Procedural, & Administrative Outliers in Five Courts Across Three Provinces.

Sealing Orders [Click]

1582235 Ontario Limited v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 1279 at paragraph 27;
“In Enterprise Sibeca Inc. v. Frelighsburg (Municipality), the Supreme Court described bad faith as “acts that are so markedly inconsistent with the relevant legislative context that a court cannot reasonably conclude that they were performed in good faith.”

Is a Public Health Scandal Plausible, as an Alternative to a Public Ethics Scandal?

The Record Contents Exceed That Criteria. [Here]

Corruption is as old as the hills. But, it is the ALIGNMENT across TIME, AGENCY, and JURISDICTION that gives rise to the inference.

Important Clues From a Prominent Actor in the PsyOp Cohort. See Expanded Guide [Here]

Walking Faith's Podcast is Coded Language to a Specific Audience of Actors. Here's Why.

First Indicator: The Transcript is Antithetical to Christian Teaching.

Second Indicator: He's Not Tongue-Tied.

Third Indicator: It's a Seamless Match to the Subject Matter.

SCC Docket Rejection Event on December 21st, 2023. Explore the Entire Court Record [Here] & [Here]

Four Years of Unnatural and Extreme Outliers that Evade Correction. Were the Adjudicators and Other Stakeholders Discreetly Nudged?

A Proximate Nudging Mechanism is Already Proven in Science. What About Something Bigger?

Covid-19 Must be Approached as a Thinking Person.

A Recent Case Raised Important Considerations.

The Covid-19 pandemic invites serious questions, as many members of the medical and scientific communities had asserted. Thinking persons will recognize that there are too many problems with the Covid-19 pandemic and the mRNA Covid vaccines in their own right that might reasonably suggest the pandemic was an innocuous public health scare, and I state that in synthesizing meaningful data. As a minimum consideration, the response to the pandemic was immensely disproportionate to the effects of the ailment, which could have been addressed through a variety of readily available means. Was a BCI or IoB coupling mechanism introduced through the vaccine's lipid nanoparticles? The following links, in accord with the observations in J.N. v. C.G., 2022 ONSC 1198, as shown below them, invite intense study. Further citations are linked at the Vaccine page (here). Justice Bennett makes compelling observations in his reasons, with the only discernible error at paragraph 67(b) in that there were no bodies found concerning Residential Schools (here).

Health Canada was proven wrong by MIT scientists concerning mRNA Genome Entry (here);
The use of public funds to disseminate the foregoing false data (here);
Onerous and disproportionate mandates, on pain of loss and career disruption for public servants including RCMP (here), and an example concerning former NS Provincial Court Justice Rickola Brinton (here);
Infectious disease doctors and specialists that claim Covid-19 "looks like influenza" (here & here), with others asserting that Covid data was hyped when compared with the flu (here);
The Appellant’s own experience of the Covid ailment that aligned with the above medical opinions, as diagnosed on December 22nd, 2024;
The availability of very effective, safe, and cheap "alternative treatments" like Ivermectin, as validated through testing (here & here);
Skilled Doctors were penalized and/or suspended for prescribing ivermectin to treat Covid (here & here);
Proof the Covid-10 Vaccines contain foreign DNA fragments (here);
Proof that Covid-19 Vaccine mRNA integrates into the genome (here);
Proof of self-assembling nanoparticles in the live blood samples of vaccinated persons, revealing amyloid fibrils that "branched out like antennae" (here, here, here, here, & here);
Microsoft Patent WO2020060606 that enables remote connectivity by way of lipid nanoparticle injection (here);
A comprehensive data footprint concerning 4IR in relation to addressing social and economic challenges (here, here, here, here, & here);
Proof of Graphene Oxide ("GO") in Covid-19 vaccines and vials (here);
A demand by the FDA that the Covid-19 vaccine content data remain sealed for seventy-five (75) years (here);
The statements by UN/WEF Stakeholders and big commercial stakeholders concerning the 4th Industrial Revolution (compiled here);
Biased, prejudiced, and unscientific media coverage in opposition to credible laboratory research (one example of many here).

J.N. v. C.G., 2022 ONSC 1198

Health Canada Misled the Public.

Vs.

The ONSC Covid Vaccine Decision Was Quashed in the Ontario Appellate Court.

The Panel Adopted Health Canada's Advisory at Face Value.

The decision above was overturned, whereas the critique of the lower court decision, J.N. v. C.G., 2022 ONSC 1198, is worthy of mention. In addressing the Respondent's objection to the Covid vaccine in the lower court motion, justice Bennett wrote at paragraphs 61 & 62;

“The same article outlines other serious concerns about COVID vaccines expressed by Dr. Bret Weinstein, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Tess Lawrie, Professor Stanley S. Levinson (medicine, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism) and Professor Sucharit Bhakdi (awarded the Order of Merit for medical microbiology). These are well-known leaders in their fields. [...] Several other articles presented by the mother outline similar expressions of concern about the COVID vaccines from equally qualified and reputable sources worldwide.”

The Appellate panel in J.N. v. C.G., 2023 ONCA 77 wrote in response at paragraph 17;

"In my view, the motion judge fell into error by not assessing whether each document presented by the respondent was reliable, independent, unbiased and authorized by someone with expertise in the area. Instead of engaging in an analysis of the evidence presented, he embarked on a lengthy discussion about whose materials were more thought-provoking, which has no bearing at all on whether the respondent’s materials were admissible and should be given any weight."

The issue in the Panel's response is that it would ask the motion judge to step outside his lane. When conflicting scientific briefs are at stake, the standard of review is correctness, as explored through a comparative study conducted by medical researchers. The motion judge had identified the fact that the opposing documents were in fact published by qualified doctors and researchers, which is all he could have reasonably done in his role. The Appellate panel overstepped its competence through a reverse ad-hominem assertion at paragraphs 18 and 45 that Pfizer and Health Canada should enjoy judicial notice because they are better qualified to interpret the data concerning vaccine contents, and because they uphold the public interest. Per the citation pictured below this text, the FDA had sought to preclude publication of the vaccine data it had relied on to license the Pfizer Covid vaccine for 75 years, until 2096. It does not require 75 years to execute record redactions, which was the basis of the ask. The issue of course is that the matter would need to be addressed through hard science. Irrespective of that, the respondent's concerns regarding her child were nonetheless grounded in credible data that invited the reasonable restraint of the court. The SCC upheld the same restraining principle in Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov, 2019 SCC 65, [2019] 4 S.C.R. 653 at paragraph 133;

"It is well established that individuals are entitled to greater procedural protection when the decision in question involves the potential for significant personal impact or harm: Baker, at para. 25. However, this principle also has implications for how a court conducts reasonableness review. Central to the necessity of adequate justification is the perspective of the individual or party over whom authority is being exercised. Where the impact of a decision on an individual’s rights and interests is severe, the reasons provided to that individual must reflect the stakes."

As it pertains to this matter, the Vaccine page highlights articles from a plethora of credible research sources such as MIT and Lund Universities that directly contradict the statements made by Health Canada. These admissions do not concern side effects that may be manageable for certain individuals, but rather, compelling findings that involve mRNA genome entry, and the existence of self-assembling nanoparticles in the blood samples of the vaccinated. The research findings show that Health Canada had misinformed the public, and spent over a half-million dollars in public funds to promote a false narrative through social influencers not unlike those at the Guide page. Likewise, the presence of graphene oxide, the "miracle material" noted earlier in the page, was "conclusive" in testing executed via micro-raman spectroscopy at the University of Almeria. The links cited in the previous section above should be explored, as they approach the matter from a variety of angles.

Might there be a public health issue at stake that is related to the scandal detailed on this website? I opine that it cannot be ruled out based on the constellation of data points available. Having said that, there is no mistaking that something was done to me personally in a manner that vitiates my privacy. Absent a whistleblower, it is unlikely I will be able to return to the life I once knew.

There is Too Much Wrong With the Covid-19 Pandemic.

The SCC in R. v. Kahsai, 2023 SCC 20 at paragraph 67, citing R. v. Wolkins, 2005 NSCA 2, 229 N.S.R. (2nd) 222, at paragraph 89, held that scandals are predominantly ascertained by way of appearance, as deduced by reasonable and objective persons having insight into their context. The test does not maintain that the observers require professional training; only that the observers be objective, rational, and informed of the circumstances.

Health Canada Proven Wrong by MIT Scientists;
The Use of Public Money to Spread False Data;
Onerous and disproportionate mandates, on pain of loss and career freeze for public servants including RCMP;
Infectious disease doctors that claim Covid-19 "looks like influenza";
My own experience of the Covid ailment that aligned with the above medical opinions;
The availability of very effective, safe, and cheap "alternative treatments" like Ivermectin;
Doctor licenses being revoked for prescribing ivermectin and alternative treatments;
The speed of production and distribution of the vaccine;
Proof that Covid-19 Vaccine mRNA integrates into the genome;
Proof of nanoparticles in live blood samples, and fibrils that "branched out like antennae";
A Microsoft Patent that, if employed, can and does turn vaccinated persons into "antennas or transmitters" (here);
The scary quotes by otherwise respected persons at the bottom of this page, at the 4IR Portal, and the Testimony;
Proof of graphene oxide ("GO") in the vaccine and vials;
FDA demanded that the vaccine contents remain sealed for seventy-five (75) years;
The statements by UN/WEF Stakeholders and big commercial stakeholders concerning the 4th Industrial Revolution;
Aggressive and unfounded suppression of dissenting opinions, including hard scientific data, by media outlets;
My own account concerning a cognitive liberty crime, which may or may not be related;
A concurrence of conduct by public stakeholders that is extremely baffling, and extremely consistent, including judges, police, regulators, registry staff, and members of the public involved in the scandal, which may or may not be related.

Vaccine Page

Graphene Oxide in Covid mRNA Vaccines "Conclusive". GQD Are Two Nanometers in Diameter.

November 13th, 2023

Inquiries Concerning Covid Vaccine Contents are Aggressively Muted.

Reuters Should Fact-Check the Blood Samples, not the MD.

The Jab vs. a Frozen Career. Were the Covid Mandates Disproportionate? (Yes..)

"It's Just the Flu.."

Symbolism Always Has a Source.

These are Not Isolated Memes.

When exploring symbolism, a topic likewise given consideration at the Guide page, one must explore cumulative effects and consistency (R. v. Harding, 2010 ABCA 180 at paragraph 10), and the relationship between that symbolism and the subject matter it is expected to refer to. While it might be assumed that the former Prime Minister and Ryan Reynolds are poking fun at anti-vaxxers, a public health scandal cannot be ruled out based on the science linked on this webpage. Likewise, the quotes as shown at the bottom of this page would prevent thinking persons from getting lost in the comedy. The question marks these data points introduce are not incompatible with the characteristics required to facilitate the scandal detailed on this website. Either a plethora of adjudicators, law enforcement professionals, and regulators in three provinces were compromised in some way, or a serious ethics scandal affects the public service that requires a systemic mode of moral bankruptcy.

Quotes & Citations

Anchor 1

Cognitive Liberty as a Human Right

https://time.com/6289229/cognitive-liberty-human-right/

“Above all, we must establish the right to cognitive liberty—as an update to liberty in the digital age—to give us self-determination over our brains and mental and experiences and protect our mental privacy and freedom of thought. Currently, nothing in the U.S. Constitution, state and federal laws, or international treaties gives us true sovereignty over our own brains. A right to cognitive liberty would empower us to access information about our brains and change them if we choose to do so, while shielding the identifying information, automatic processes, memories, and silent images and utterances in our minds from others. We must act quickly to secure our brains and mental processes—while the choice is still ours to make.”

https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2023/04/we-should-be-fighting-for-our-cognitive-liberty-says-ethics-expert/

“Cognitive liberty should be recognized as both a legal and a societal norm and should be reflected in international human rights law, Farahany said. She added that the mechanism to do it is by updating the definition of privacy to include mental privacy, and updating freedom of thought to include freedom from interception, manipulation, and punishment of our thoughts, as well as self-determination. Cognitive liberty is the right to self-determination over our brains and mental experiences, as a right to both access and use technologies, but also a right to be free from interference with our mental privacy and freedom of thought,” said Farahany. [...] Corporations and governments are already hacking into people’s brains.”

A precursor to cognitive liberty crimes might include the Canadian MKUltra scandal;
https://newsinteractives.cbc.ca/longform/brainwashed-mkultra/

“During the Cold War, the CIA secretly funded mind-control experiments on unwitting Canadians in a program codenamed MK-ULTRA. The experiments laid the groundwork for modern-day torture techniques. And victims and their families are still seeking recognition and justice.”

Immediacy & Relevance

Transhumanism as the dominant ideology of the fourth industrial revolution
By Klaus-Gerd Giesen, Translated and edited by Cadenza Academic Translations
Translator: Ruth Grant, Editor: Matt Burden, Senior editor: Mark Mellor Pages 189 to 203
https://shs.cairn.info/journal-international-de-bioethique-et-d-ethique-des-sciences-2018-3-page-189?lang=en

“Transhumanist ideology is driven by certain factions within the state and, above all, by mighty multinational corporations that, it is fair to say, have the most to gain from seeing the NBIC revolution unfold without a hitch. [...] These tech giants have already poured staggering amounts of money into the fourth industrial revolution and are currently spending equally eye-watering amounts on political lobbying and social engineering initiatives. [...] There is every reason to fear that the world will launch into the fourth industrial revolution without too much debate over what is waiting in the wings: the global political project that is transhumanism. Today, it is as if the metamorphosis, via the “NBIC Great Convergence,” to a posthuman being, technologically enhanced and fully integrated with the machine, were already written in stone.”

The Fourth Industrial Revolution; What it Means & How to Respond
Klaus Schwab, Founder and Chairman of the Board of Trustees, World Economic Forum
https://www.weforum.org/stories/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/ [The Impact on People]

“The Fourth Industrial Revolution, finally, will change not only what we do but who we are. It will affect our identity and all the issues associated with it: our sense of privacy, our notions of ownership, our consumption patterns, the time we devote to work and leisure, and how we develop our careers, cultivate our skills, meet people, and nurture relationships. It is already changing our health and leading to a “quantified” self, and sooner than we think it may lead to human augmentation. The list is endless because it is bound only by our imagination.”

Exploring Biodigital Convergence: Policy Horizons Canada
Kristel Van Der Elst, Director, Policy Horizons Canada; Former Head of Strategic Foresight at the World Economic Forum; Director, The Global Foresight Group
https://horizons.service.canada.ca/en/2020/02/11/exploring-biodigital-convergence/

“In the coming years, biodigital technologies could be woven into our lives in the way that digital technologies are now. Biological and digital systems are converging, and could change the way we work, live, and even evolve as a species. More than a technological change, this biodigital convergence may transform the way we understand ourselves and cause us to redefine what we consider human or natural.”

What’s the Deal with the Great Reset?
(Global News Interview w/ Pierre Poilievre, MP)
https://globalnews.ca/news/7480328/commentary-the-great-reset/

“It’s on the World Economic Forum website and it’s what the prime minister is saying in his own words,” Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre told me. [...] Now is not the time to ‘reimagine’ our economic system. Now is exactly the wrong time to use the Canadian economy as a laboratory, or a guinea pig to play out the experiments of international financial elites.”

Cryptocurrency Mining Using Body Activity Data: Merging Technology and Human Energy (deleted but archived)
Keith Brown, Satellite Technician via Linkedin Re: Microsoft Patent
https://archive.ph/FfOVM

“Nanotechnology, the manipulation of matter on an atomic and molecular scale, has made remarkable strides in diverse fields, including healthcare. In recent times, nanotechnology has gained significant attention due to its potential applications in vaccine development and drug delivery. Microsoft's patent alludes to the possibility of coupling nanotechnology with vaccinated individuals, effectively turning them into antennas or transmitters. This intriguing concept raises questions about the extent of integration between technology and the human body, blurring the line between biological and technological systems.”

Davos23: Are you ready for brain transparency?
Dr. Nina Farahany
https://www.weforum.org/videos/davos-am23-ready-for-brain-transparency-english/

“Along with emails, text messages, and GPS location data, the government has subpoenaed employees' brainwave data from the past year. They have compelling evidence that one of your coworkers has committed massive wire fraud. Now, they are looking for his co-conspirators. You discover they are looking for synchronized brain activity between your co-worker and the people he has been working with. While you know you have been innocent of any crime, you had been secretly working with him on a new start-up venture. Shaking, you remove your earbuds. Is that a future you think you are ready for? You may be surprised to learn that it is a future that has already arrived. Everything in that video that you just saw is based on technology that is already here today.”

Now is the Time for a Great Reset
World Economic Forum, June 2020
https://www.weforum.org/stories/2020/06/now-is-the-time-for-a-great-reset/

“The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to support the public good, especially by addressing health and social challenges.”

Davos 2017: WEF Chairman Klaus Schwab & Sergey Brin (Google co-founder)
https://x.com/ReedCooley/status/1729950876381426081

“Can you imagine that in ten years, when we are sitting here, we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel what you are feeling? Because you will all have implants. I can remeasure your brainwaves, and I can immediately tell you how some people react to your answers. Is it imaginable?”

Biotechnology, Human Enhancement and Human Augmentation: A Way Ahead for Research and Policy
Canadian Department of National Defense, December 2021 (Unclassified)
https://cradpdf.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/PDFS/unc386/p814643_A1b.pdf

“On a societal level, enhancement to Defence and Security personnel may be rejected by sections of society, particularly where radical augmentation is perceived. This may further exacerbate the distance of understanding from a civilian population to its serving military. Such resistance could influence the pace of technological development or national adoption. It will be the role of local government to facilitate ongoing discourse and engagement reaching across state and society. [...] More invasive technologies, likely also permanent with potentially greater gains in efficacy but greater risks (e.g., implanted brain computer interfaces or genetic editing) will necessarily require new legal definitions for adoption or prohibition depending on the ruling of domestic and international bodies (see tables provided in the Military Medicine, Force Protection, and Warfighter Performance chapters in Naik et al, 2021 [5]). The implementation of new law or the amendment of existing law will require the efforts and involvement of scientists, lawyers, medics, and bioethics experts. In addition, more radical approaches to policy development may be required in order to keep pace with technology development and ahead of adversarial adoption. [...] From a Compliance perspective, the autonomy of individual states may create an uneven landscape in terms of legal definitions. Where domestic law may vary, it will be the onus of international bodies (such as NATO and the United Nations) to provide an agreed legal framework for the use of biotechnologies for human enhancement. The absence of such effort will impact on interoperability between allies and maneuverability against the adversary. [...] The issue is not only that technology is evolving faster than regulatory frameworks but the exacerbation with differences in ethical, moral, and legal perspectives across nations in regard to human enhancement and augmentation.”

DNA: The Ultimate Data-Storage Solution
Scientific American, May 28th, 2021
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dna-the-ultimate-data-storage-solution/

“DNA can archive a staggering amount of information in an almost inconceivably small volume. Consider this: humanity will generate an estimated 33 zettabytes of data by 2025—that’s 3.3 followed by 22 zeroes. DNA storage can squeeze all that information into a ping-pong ball, with room to spare. The 74 million million bytes of information in the Library of Congress could be crammed into a DNA archive the size of a poppy seed—6,000 times over. Split the seed in half, and you could store all of Facebook’s data. Science fiction? Hardly. DNA storage technology exists today, but to make it viable, researchers have to clear a few daunting technological hurdles around integrating different technologies.”

Silicon Immortality: Downloading Consciousness into Computers
David Eagleman (Neuroscientist, Author, Technologist, Entrepreneur)
https://eagleman.com/latest/silicon-immortality-downloading-consciousness-into-computers/

“Therefore, well before we understand how brains work, we will find ourselves able to digitally copy the brain’s structure and able to download the conscious mind into a computer. [...] But assuming we haven’t missed anything important in our theoretical frameworks, then we have the problem cornered and I expect to see the downloading of consciousness come to fruition in my lifetime.”

The immortalist: Uploading the mind to a computer
BBC News, March 14, 2016
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-35786771

"If there is no immortality technology, I'll be dead in the next 35 years," he laments. Death is inevitable - currently at least - because as we get older the cells that make up our bodies lose their ability to repair themselves, making us vulnerable to cardiovascular disease and other age-related conditions that kill about two-thirds of us. So Itskov is putting a slice of his fortune into a bold plan he has devised to bypass ageing. He wants to use cutting-edge science to unlock the secrets of the human brain and then upload an individual's mind to a computer, freeing them from the biological constraints of the body. "The ultimate goal of my plan is to transfer someone's personality into a completely new body," he says.”

5 visions of the future from our Global Technology Governance Summit
World Economic Forum, April 16th, 2021
https://www.weforum.org/stories/2021/04/global-technology-governance-summit-gtgs-future/

“Synthetic biology includes CRISPR, the gene-editing technology currently being used to fight COVID-19. “We’re talking about improving biology and redesigning organisms for beneficial purposes,” said Professor Amy Webb of New York University’s Stern School of Business. It's going to allow us to not just edit genomes but also, and importantly, to write a new code for life – we will have write-level permissions,” she added. “This could and will transform not just health but also materials. I can’t think of an area in which we won’t see a significant improvement.”

On the History and Potential of CRISPR and Gene Drive (deleted but archived)
By Geoff Ralston, Former CEO, Y-Combinator, w/ Sam Altman, Craig Cannon, Karen Lien, and Jon Ralston
https://web.archive.org/web/20201112022505/https://www.ycombinator.com/library/4C-on-the-history-and-potential-of-crispr-and-gene-drive

“The very nature of the human race is about to change. This change will be radical and rapid beyond anything in our species’ history. A chapter of our story just ended and the next chapter has begun. [...] CRISPR techniques are getting better and better. More accurate. More predictable. Cheaper. And we are learning more and more about the genetic code (partially thanks to our ability, now using CRISPR, to see what happens when we poke out one gene and replace it with another). The trends are unstoppable and the conclusion unavoidable: in the not very distant future we will be able to program most any animal in most any way we wish, including human beings. [...] What will stop people from attempting to drive desirable characteristics into a population? What will stop a government from mandating those changes in their population? And what will competing governments then choose to do?"

Evolving Modes of Governance: Changing Socioeconomic Conditions & Technologies

Data & Governance
Dr. Yuval Noah Harari, WEF Advisor & Spokesperson
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/10/yuval-noah-harari-technology-tyranny/568330/

“We tend to think about the conflict between democracy and dictatorship as a conflict between two different ethical systems, but it is actually a conflict between two different data-processing systems. Democracy distributes the power to process information and make decisions among many people and institutions, whereas dictatorship concentrates information and power in one place. [...] However, artificial intelligence may soon swing the pendulum in the opposite direction. AI makes it possible to process enormous amounts of information centrally. In fact, it might make centralized systems far more efficient than diffuse systems, because machine learning works better when the machine has more information to analyze.”

“As the physical, digital, and biological worlds continue to converge, new technologies and platforms will increasingly enable citizens to engage with governments, voice their opinions, coordinate their efforts, and even circumvent the supervision of public authorities. Simultaneously, governments will gain new technological powers to increase their control over populations, based on pervasive surveillance systems and the ability to control digital infrastructure. On the whole, however, governments will increasingly face pressure to change their current approach to public engagement and policy making, as their central role of conducting policy diminishes owing to new sources of competition and the redistribution and decentralization of power that new technologies make possible.

Ultimately, the ability of government systems and public authorities to adapt will determine their survival. If they prove capable of embracing a world of disruptive change, subjecting their structures to the levels of transparency and efficiency that will enable them to maintain their competitive edge, they will endure. If they cannot evolve, they will face increasing trouble.

This will be particularly true in the realm of regulation. Current systems of public policy and decision-making evolved alongside the Second Industrial Revolution, when decision-makers had time to study a specific issue and develop the necessary response or appropriate regulatory framework. The whole process was designed to be linear and mechanistic, following a strict “top down” approach.

But such an approach is no longer feasible. Given the Fourth Industrial Revolution’s rapid pace of change and broad impacts, legislators and regulators are being challenged to an unprecedented degree and for the most part are proving unable to cope.

How, then, can they preserve the interest of the consumers and the public at large while continuing to support innovation and technological development? By embracing “agile” governance, just as the private sector has increasingly adopted agile responses to software development and business operations more generally. This means regulators must continuously adapt to a new, fast-changing environment, reinventing themselves so they can truly understand what it is they are regulating. To do so, governments and regulatory agencies will need to collaborate closely with business and civil society.

The Fourth Industrial Revolution will also profoundly impact the nature of national and international security, affecting both the probability and the nature of conflict. The history of warfare and international security is the history of technological innovation, and today is no exception. Modern conflicts involving states are increasingly “hybrid” in nature, combining traditional battlefield techniques with elements previously associated with non-state actors. The distinction between war and peace, combatant and noncombatant, and even violence and nonviolence (think cyberwarfare) is becoming uncomfortably blurry.

As this process takes place and new technologies such as autonomous or biological weapons become easier to use, individuals and small groups will increasingly join states in being capable of causing mass harm. This new vulnerability will lead to new fears. But at the same time, advances in technology will create the potential to reduce the scale or impact of violence, through the development of new modes of protection, for example, or greater precision in targeting.”

In Canada, Follow the Money & the Ideas
Terence Corcoran for the Financial Post
https://financialpost.com/opinion/terence-corcoran-in-canada-follow-the-money-the-ideas

“In a short 2017 video clip circulating on YouTube, Klaus Schwab, head of the World Economic Forum and the global promoter of corporatist stakeholder capitalism, outlines how his subversive WEF movement has, to use his word, “infiltrated” governments all over the world. He makes special note of Canada. “I have to say, when I mention now names, like Mrs. (Angela) Merkel and even Vladimir Putin, and so on, they all have been Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum. But what we are very proud of now is the young generation like Prime Minister (Justin) Trudeau … We penetrate the cabinet. So yesterday I was at a reception for Prime Minister Trudeau and I know that half of his cabinet, or even more than half of his cabinet, are actually Young Global Leaders. [...] Schwab and the WEF had help in setting up their Canadian infiltration mission, including from Trudeau’s former chief of staff, Gerald Butts, a participant in the WEF’s Davos conferences and a leading backroom organizer of the Trudeau government’s ideological gambits. When it comes to subversive plans to overthrow the free-world economy, few are larger in scope than the WEF’s global scheme to remake the world and install a new form of “capitalism” based on the recruitment of corporate leaders into the role of government. The WEF infiltration of Ottawa has never been a secret, nor has Butts’ involvement. But it is far from being common knowledge among voters that the ideological model behind the Liberal policy machine, the steering mechanism that guides decisions and policies, is subversive and authoritarian. It also covers a massive policy territory, from climate to COVID-19.”

The WEF Casts a Long Shadow Across Canada
Chris George for the Niagara Independent
https://niagaraindependent.ca/the-wef-casts-a-long-shadow-across-canada/

“The WEF’s Davos conference is designed to bring the world’s decision makers into closed-door meetings to discuss coordination in global affairs and WEF initiatives. It is an overt effort to influence global agendas and decision making, and lobby for public-private cooperation. Conspiracy theorists purport Klaus Schwab and the WEF have a manipulative and direct control over participating government leaders. That is not so. Rather, it is an indirect pressure being applied at these WEF gatherings for participants to “join in” and commit to implementing global action plans. Canadians are mostly unaware of how Trudeau, Freeland, and others in the Liberal cabinet are purposely advancing the WEF agenda in Canada. They do so without any sharing of details. Legacy media obscures any available facts. [...] The WEF and its global agenda for 2030 casts a long shadow across Canada. The WEF’s ambitious global agenda is well documented, and it is publicized at events like the annual Davos conference. Less public are the actions of the Trudeau government in relation to the commitments made to the WEF global agenda. Still, the desired outcomes of the Canadian government’s policy and actions can be assessed by the end goals enunciated by Klaus Schwab and WEF spokespeople.”

2030 Canada Agenda National Strategy
https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/programs/agenda-2030/national-strategy.html

“In September 2015, Canada and all United Nations Member States adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (the 2030 Agenda), a shared blueprint for partnership, peace and prosperity for all people and the planet, now and into the future. The 2030 Agenda focuses on the commitment to leave no one behind.”

UN Sustainable Development Agenda
https://news.un.org/en/story/2015/09/509732
https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2015/09/historic-new-sustainable-development-agenda-unanimously-adopted-by-193-un-members/

“The new agenda is a promise by leaders to all people everywhere. It is a universal, integrated and transformative vision for a better world. It is an agenda for people, to end poverty in all its forms – an agenda for the planet, our common home,” declared Mr. Ban as he opened the UN Sustainable Development Summit which kicked off today and wraps up Sunday.”

UN Decade of Action
https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/decade-of-action/

“In September 2019, the UN Secretary-General called on all sectors of society to mobilize for a decade of action on three levels: global action to secure greater leadership, more resources and smarter solutions for the Sustainable Development Goals; local action embedding the needed transitions in the policies, budgets, institutions and regulatory frameworks of governments, cities and local authorities; and people action, including by youth, civil society, the media, the private sector, unions, academia and other stakeholders, to generate an unstoppable movement pushing for the required transformations.”

Note: https://knowledge.insead.edu/strategy/power-stakeholder-media
Note: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksb3KD6DfSI
“Scholars predicted the rise of media controlled by purposeful communities in the early 2000s.”

UN Declaration: Agenda 2030
https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

At paragraph 50; “Today we are also taking a decision of great historic significance. We resolve to build a better future for all people, including the millions who have been denied the chance to lead decent, dignified and rewarding lives and to achieve their full human potential. We can be the first generation to succeed in ending poverty; just as we may be the last to have a chance of saving the planet. The world will be a better place in 2030 if we succeed in our objectives.”

Note concerning the underlined text: Planet Earth is 4.543 billion years old. Science would not support a read of this text concerning the physical environment.

UN Declaration: Agile Nations Charter
https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/laws/developing-improving-federal-regulations/modernizing-regulations/agile-nations.html

“In October 2021, member nations approved the first Agile Nations work programme of 10 projects. Under this workplan, Canada will work with Agile Nations partners to address issues ranging from cyber security and digital technologies to the use of regulatory experimentation. These projects involve sharing ideas, testing new solutions and identifying opportunities for regulators to better support innovative industries in introducing and scaling new technologies. Participating departments and agencies include; Health Canada, Innovation Science & Economic Development Canada, Standards Council of Canada, Transport Canada, & Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat.”

Regulatory Experimentation
https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/laws/developing-improving-federal-regulations/modernizing-regulations/regulatory-experimentation.html

“Regulators are required to make decisions in the face of uncertainty. Regulators use regulatory experimentation to generate evidence and information that can be used in decision making to help reduce that uncertainty. A regulatory experiment is a trial or test of a new product, service, approach or process designed to generate evidence or information that can inform the design or administration of a regulatory regime. Regulatory experiments are unique in that they are specifically designed to support regulatory decision making.”

UPDATED: 'Why the secrecy?' Leslyn Lewis questions Canada's signing of WEF's Agile Nations Charter
https://www.westernstandard.news/news/updated-why-the-secrecy-leslyn-lewis-questions-canadas-signing-of-wefs-agile-nations-charter/article_cad45eca-999f-11ed-9798-431415585187.html

“Two years after Canada signed on to the World Economic Forum-initiated Agile Nations Charter, Conservative MP Leslyn Lewis is blowing the whistle on the "secrecy" surrounding the program. "The Liberals chose to enter into a World Economic Forum (WEF) initiated Charter without parliamentary input," Lewis (Haldimand—Norfolk, ON) said. "The unelected WEF is not our government. Canadians didn’t sign up for the WEF’s plan to create agile rule making in a post-pandemic world and the 4th Industrial Revolution."

Toronto Star Editorial on AI & Agile Regulation

https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/artificial-intelligence-doesn-t-need-agile-governance-it-needs-firm-regulation/article_4ec92949-dab4-5b5a-9f70-24ebd8838556.html

“Society is one big AI experiment right now: we’re the testing ground for a massive techno-economic transformation we’ve not consented to and that most of us don’t even understand properly. AI is being deployed across society with little input into what we actually want from it. Our experimental status is evidenced, for example, in the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica scandal: our very personal political decisions, choices, and discussions have been distorted and trashed with little comeuppance for the Big Tech companies intent on making a buck at the expense of spreading misinformation, disinformation, and outright lies. And it looks like this will be the new normal until we can rein in the algorithms developed by Facebook, YouTube, Google, and others. A key policy approach for addressing this AI roll-out is something called “agile governance,” promoted especially by international institutions like the World Economic Forum. In this framework, we, as individuals and a society, are supposed to adapt to the emerging AI technologies that we don’t understand, and aren’t even expected to bother understanding. It entails shifting oversight of new technologies from the government to the private sector, and comes across as another term for “leave it to the market” — which today really means leave it to a Big Tech monopoly. Instead of this state of affairs, we need a more nuanced approach to emerging AI technologies in order to understand how they’re going to reconfigure our societies, yes, but also how our societies configure these technologies in our own image. AI, in particular, is often premised on taking our personal data — usually with our (un)informed consent — and using it to train algorithms, claiming any resulting inferences (data on our data) derived from that training as proprietary.”

200+ Groups Denounce UN-WEF Agreement That Entrenches Corporate Interests Driving Global 'Social and Environmental Crises

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2019/09/27/200-groups-denounce-un-wef-agreement-entrenches-corporate-interests-driving-global

“Over 200 civil society groups this week voiced their firm opposition to a recently-inked agreement between the United Nations and World Economic Forum that stands to further entrench transnational corporations and their interests in global governance. "It moves the world dangerously towards a privatized and undemocratic global governance," said Gonzalo Berron of Transnational Institute. At issue is the "strategic partnership agreement" between the U.N. and WEF for the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The agenda purports to be "a plan of action for people, planet, and prosperity." Signed in June, the agreement says the U.N. and WEF will "strengthen their partnership by focusing on jointly selected priorities and pursuing a more strategic and coordinated collaboration." But, according to the groups, the agreement threatens to "de-legitimize the United Nations and provide transnational corporations preferential and deferential access to the U.N. system”

Concerning the 2019 UN/WEF Strategic Agreement
https://www.fian.org/en/press-release/article/wef-takeover-of-un-strongly-condemned-2273

“This agreement between the UN and WEF formalizes a disturbing corporate capture of the UN. It moves the world dangerously towards a privatized and undemocratic global governance.”
- Gonzalo Berron, Transnational Institute

“This strategic agreement is a coup for the corporate leaders at Davos, but what does it offer the UN and the international community? This gives some of the most controversial corporations unprecedented access to the heart of the UN, yet it has not even been properly discussed by the UN’s country members and certainly not by the broader public.”
- Harris Gleckman, Former UN Official & Senior Fellow at the Univ. of Massachusetts

“The UN should acknowledge the different roles of private interest and of rights-holders that look after common goods and benefits. [...] The WEF represents the interests of those who destroy the environment and abuse our human rights. It can not be considered a strategic partner in solving the world’s crises."
- Sofia Monsalve, FIAN International Secretary-General

Having a Politically Partisan CEO Can Lead to More Company Misconduct, Study Finds
https://www.wsj.com/business/c-suite/partisan-ceo-company-results-65ec91a2

“Companies with stridently political CEOs are more likely to engage in corporate misconduct, according to new research. And that’s true regardless of whether the leader leans conservative or liberal. [...] After excluding some firms due to missing data, the study’s final sample consisted of 498 companies and 831 CEOs. The analysis found instances of misconduct at 365 companies, nearly three-quarters of the sample, with a median of four violations that triggered monetary penalties per company. Firms led by the most-partisan CEOs—whether liberal or conservative—were almost 50% more likely to engage in misconduct than companies led by less-partisan peers, they concluded.”

CEO Political Partisanship and Corporate Misconduct
https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amj.2022.0909

“This study unearths the ideological bases of misconduct by distinguishing the values and identity perspectives of political ideology. Rather than attributing misconduct to liberal or conservative values, we introduce and examine CEO political partisanship—that is, the strength of a CEO’s identification with political and ideological groups. We hypothesize and find robust evidence for a positive relationship between CEO political partisanship and corporate misconduct in a sample of Fortune 500 CEOs from 2010 to 2018. Our findings thus contribute to the conversation on the role of political ideology in organizations by unearthing the organizational implications of political identities. As CEOs increasingly engage in political discussions and political divisions grow stronger, our study offers a timely warning about the harmful link between CEO political partisanship and corporate misconduct.”