Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act (S.C. 2000, c. 24) [Link]
Zersetzung
AI-Assisted Social Engineering in a Post-Democratic Canada
“The police must investigate crime. That is their duty. In the vast majority of cases, they carry out this duty with diligence and care. Occasionally, however, mistakes are made. These mistakes may have drastic consequences."
Hill v. Hamilton‑Wentworth Regional Police Services Board, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 129, 2007 SCC 41 @ paragraph 1
"A post-democratic society is one that continues to have and to use all the institutions of democracy, but in which they increasingly become a formal shell. The energy and innovative drive pass away from the democratic arena and into small circles of a politico-economic elite."
Dr. Colin Crouch, Post Democracy, 2004, ISBN 0-7456-3315-3
"Zersetzung methods are designed to break down, undermine, and paralyze people behind a facade of social normality, in a form of silent repression".
Mike Dennis, Norman LaPorte (2011). ISBN 978-0-857-45-195-8
"The experience of being gang-stalked appears to be a widespread phenomenon that has been subject to little scientific examination. [...] It also serves to confirm the harmful effects of the gang-stalking experience upon sufferers, first set out in the only other study available. These findings constitute a potent reason why gang-stalking should be regarded as an important subject for study."
Event captures like this require AI-Assisted 4IR tools. Canada is testing biodigital convergence modalities on Citizens in partnership with big tech, with the support of individuals, corporations, and agencies in the public service. Including police stakeholders. Review the findings in Sheridan et al., 2020 with respect to the potential scope.
As above, per the fabricated HRP report that was fed to EHS. Actual event details at the HRP Page (Here).
An Organized Transnational Framework Protected by Courts & Police in Canada, Supported by CAF IA.
Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46) [Link]
Section 83.22 (1): Every person who knowingly instructs, directly or indirectly, any person to carry out a terrorist activity is guilty of an indictable offense and liable to imprisonment for life.
Section 83.22 (2) An offense may be committed under subsection (1) whether or not;
(a) The terrorist activity is actually carried out;
(b) the accused instructs a particular person to carry out the terrorist activity;
(c) the accused knows the identity of the person whom the accused instructs to carry out the terrorist activity; or
(d) the person whom the accused instructs to carry out the terrorist activity knows that it is a terrorist activity.
VISUAL EXHIBITS: CIMIC | PsyOp | Cybercrime
A collage of visual exhibits supplemental to the testimony. Delivery via tailored algorithms underscores the mode of sponsorship.
*CAGE Retainer Fee Claims*
Eight (8) 30-minute hearings w/ minimal prep.
Seven (7) lawyers assigned to overlapping tasks.
The customary tariff is $4,500 ($500 x 8 hearings).
One (1) 20-minute hearing w/ minimal prep.
Would a reasonable person pay those retainer fees?
S-228567, discontinued prior to S-229680 by way of an improper format, involved the same prep as its successor, and also involved one short hearing. S-228567 was billed at $1,601.60 pursuant to court tariffs. S-229680 was billed at $78,360.36 as above, in a scandal involving special costs. Ie., a "Cost Delta". Special costs align with reasonable lawyer retainer fees per the established legal tests.
"Special costs are fees a reasonable client would pay a reasonably competent solicitor to do the work described in the bill."
- Bradshaw Construction Ltd. v. Bank of Nova Scotia (1991), 54 B.C.L.R. (2d) 309 (S.C.), para 44
Denied SCC Docket Entry W/O Written Reasons.
Per Justice Iacobucci in R. v. C.P., 2021 SCC 19 at paragraph 137 concerning the Supreme Court of Canada Docket Test
“There is no basis to believe that a serious argument pointing to a miscarriage of justice would not meet the public interest standard for leave to appeal to the Court. [...] The Supreme Court would and does exercise its leave requirement in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.”
Click to View
"Net-Zero E-Missions"
_2.png)
_1.png)
I would stress I am not a digital content creator, and whereas, deepfake content may be involved.
_3.png)
Compelling Questions Concerning State Conduct
Acute AI-Assisted Surveillance Since Events with the CAGE Began
On May 11th, 2023, I had a small backyard bonfire mishap involving nearby foliage that was resolved in roughly two minutes through a few buckets of water. Two fire trucks showed up at the three-minute mark, with several police officers in tow. The alacrity of the response seemed impossible, and it was widely disproportionate to the scope. I spoke briefly to the officers and then settled-in for the night. Less than two days later on the morning of Saturday, May 13th, a large white van rolled into the driveway, accompanied by a police paddy wagon. Two social workers and three police officers identified as a "mental health crisis team". They interviewed me in the living room while I was still in my pajamas. I was able to glean from the social worker that her concern had ultimately stemmed from pejorative guidance provided by HRP, and not the innocuous fire incident itself. I was then asked to accompany them to the Halifax QEII Health Centre. I peaceably objected to the unfounded violation of my privacy (R. v. Ahmad, 2020 SCC 11 at paragraph 38), before being handcuffed, and placed in the back seat of the van. I waited in the ER lobby with an HRP officer for roughly five hours before being interviewed by a medical resident. After a brief discussion that I recorded, as is show below, the EHS resident was satisfied that HRP's response was disproportionate. The event was telegraphed, as is the case with other event milestones, and was likewise reflected through visuals that appear to be generated through AI.
As above per the embellished HRP report that was provided to EHS. Full details at the HRP Page (Here).
May 13, 2023 Live Audio Recording Hfx QE II
Confronting Normalcy Bias | A Systemic Problem
The foregoing evidences a mature framework. This scandal has revealed a framework much broader than an isolated account of criminal retaliation in the wake of a shareholder dispute with a state-sponsored CAGE Director. This framework evidences a state interest in social engineering which manifests in ways that violate Canadian Constitutional Law. Recent research has likewise contemplated a "widespread phenomenon" which appears to have manifested in a number of countries (Sheridan et al., 2020). This research gleaned its study group from an initial dataset of over twenty million online references. In terms of context, that is half the population of Canada. Articles by the New York Times and the CBC are dismissive of the accounts they cite (over 10,000 in the NYT piece), though the opinions cited in these articles are limited to conjecture. While it might be true that a portion of respondents do suffer some form of mental illness, the statistical analysis concerning this subject is far too robust to preclude its relevance. Likewise, my Affidavit records present widespread accounts of sophisticated criminal mischief, and a consistent reluctance on the part of adjudicative agencies to address it, irrespective of their mandates. Correcting this scandal may invariably assist countless other people victimized by similar conditions, whether or not they also experienced abuse in courts.
Police Oath to Uphold the Constitution
The precedent in 495793 Ontario Ltd. (Central Auto Parts) v. Barclay, 2016 ONCA 656 sets an exceptionally low threshold for police involvement. Juriansz J.A. states at paragraph 51;
“The function of police is to investigate incidents which might be criminal, make a conscientious and informed decision as to whether charges should be laid and present the full facts to the prosecutor: Wong, at para. 56. Although this requires, to some extent, the weighing of evidence in the course of investigation, police are not required to evaluate the evidence to a legal standard or make legal judgments. That is the task of prosecutors, defense lawyers and judges: Hill, at para. 50.”
Juriansz J.A. elaborates at paragraph 52;
“Nor is a police officer required to exhaust all possible routes of investigation or inquiry, interview all potential witnesses prior to arrest, or to obtain the suspect's version of events or otherwise establish there is no valid defense before being able to form reasonable and probable grounds: Kellman v. Iverson, 2012 ONSC 3244 (CanLI), [2012] O.J. No. 2529, at para. 16; Wong, at para. 59.”
McLachlin C.J. states in the first paragraph of Hill v. Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Police Services Board, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 129, 2007 SCC 41;
“The police must investigate crime. That is their duty. In the vast majority of cases, they carry out this duty with diligence and care. Occasionally, however, mistakes are made. These mistakes may have drastic consequences.”
Paragraphs 44 and 140 in Hill further underscore the public interest;
“The effective and responsible investigation of crime is one of the basic duties of the state, which cannot be abdicated. [...] The enforcement of the criminal law is one of the most important aspects of the maintenance of law and order in a free society. Police officers are the main actors who have been entrusted to fulfill this important function. ”
Frameworks | Feasibility
A framework of this scope can be APPLIED to one individual, but it was not DEVELOPED for one individual.
At the onset of criminal mischief in November 2021 following the initial shareholder dispute, a caricature of the CAGE Director appeared on my laptop via remote intrusion with the words, "power that can't be insulted". As unnerving as that was, the scope, consistency, and characteristics of this scandal preclude consideration of the same individual as an independent perpetrator. One tech CEO could not cost-effectively hire an army of social influencers and CIMIC operators to act on his behalf for over two years, and likewise, shape the conduct of five courts and three police agencies across three provinces to act against their mandates and Constitutional law on his behalf, as is shown in the Litigation page and in the Affidavits. This scandal involves third-party influence. That same influence must be paired with a purpose significant enough to justify costs, manage risks, and possess the means to execute disruptive influence in public institutions and agencies.
In applying the inference test in Sherman Estate, supra, at paragraphs 97-98, this scandal could exclusively involve retaliatory hate crime if the victim were “plugged into” an existing framework, such as the framework explored in the articles on this site, and as contemplated in Sheridan et al., 2020. There are evidentiary components in my Testimony dating to 2013 which suggest external interests, but either way, one must explore an inexorable conclusion that there are more, perhaps many more, victims of organized state-sponsored crime in Canada, and whereas, it is evidenced that public awareness of these activities has been effectively squelched through willful omission and gaslighting. Were this framework to be dealt with here and now, it is reasonable to suggest a roadmap could be developed to help other victims.
The next component in exploring the matter, absent direct whistleblower testimony, seeks to discern why a destructive framework exists as explored in Sheridan et al., 2020, and in this case, within a Constitutional Democracy. This is further contemplated in the links directly below, again leveraging the requirements of the Sherman Estate test. The point of departure involves exploring the goals and interests of those capable of exerting influence beyond customary systems of governance, as coupled with the details and evidentiary records of my Testimony.
Transhumanism as the Dominant Ideology of the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Journal international de bioéthique et d'éthique des sciences Issue 3-4, 2018, pages 189 to 203 | Translated and edited by Cadenza Academic Translations | Translator: Ruth Grant, Editor: Matt Burden, Senior editor: Mark Mellor
Police Agencies Protected the Perpetrators. Courts in Three Provinces Protected Both.
RCMP Acknowledged Reports. Offered No Support.
This Has To Stop.
BC Court Oral Reasons...
Mountains, Mole-Hills, and Marshmallows
May 11th, 2023: I prepared a backyard bonfire as I do from time to time. Nearby foliage caught fire by accident, mea-culpa. The fire was quickly contained using two buckets of water. Fire dept arrived within minutes. Police arrived concurrently. Fire was out before they arrived. Personnel departed soon after.
May 13th, 2023: A "Mental Health Crisis Team" arrives early Saturday morning with a police paddy wagon. I was handcuffed and taken to the QE2 (hospital). I was required to wait 5 hours in the ER lobby and be interviewed by a psychiatrist. Social Worker advised her "real concern" was related to the December 8th, 2022 false police report as denoted above. Police "sought a deposition" from psychiatrist. Ushered into a windowless 8x10 room fitted with ceiling-mounted video cameras, I walked the psychiatrist through my Affidavit, notarized the previous day. Psychiatrist agreed that a compelled visit to a mental health facility is a disproportionate response to a campfire accident. True audio transcript excerpts below.
Testimony shared with accompanying HRP Constable
Honestly..
Citizens Can't Expect Their Charter Rights to be Upheld if Frameworks Like This Remain Unanswered. When the Institutions We Depend on are Weaponized, the Only Recourse is Whistleblowers, Publicity, & Advocacy.
2018 Vancouver
Skytrain Poster
Twenty Million Citations | Suppressed Coverage | 2020 Study: Link
Click to Sign the Petition
Blow the Whistle.