UN Human Rights Council reports A/HRC/43/49, A/HRC/57/61, A/HRC/58/58 and Resolution 58/6 warn that neurotechnology, psychological operations, and online “cybertorture” pose serious risks to mental privacy and judicial independence. 
         
Evidence consistent with those risks surfaced in relation to a shareholder scandal implicating a Federally-sponsored technology firm:  tight timing correlations, marked deviations from a lifelong behavioural baseline, glaring statistical outliers such as a half-million-dollar billing scandal ≈9,000% above customary tariffs, and reinforcing patterns across multiple institutions.  In response, five courts sealed key records, departed from procedural and jurisprudential safeguards, curtailed discovery, and refused appeals.
 

The site’s white papers argue that this cumulative pattern best aligns with a non-consensual, state-adjacent human experimentation pilot using an emerging biodigital toolkit, rather than a four-year concurrence of serious errors.  This website aggregates redacted court materials, police correspondence, and reproducible AI-assisted audits to facilitate independent review.  Digest, don't skim.  To safeguard the record, you can download a complete offline copy of this site (for example, using HTTrack).